"God forbid the majority might realize that we are not only being lied to about optimal nutrition; what if they realize we are also being lied to about vaccines, our monetary system, organised religion, terror attacks and so on.. What if they realize that nobody has the right to ‘govern’ anybody?"
OMG, I'm already there on every point!
Yes, the moneyed psychopaths in control are aiming to take most of Us out, and keep the few left as servants, slaves, sex toys, and sacrifices.
RFK, Jr going after the foodstuffs now: pure theatre. it's not to make us healthy, Bobby being too much beholden to & part of the establishment. he's neither addressing better food patterns nor Big pHarma. good one: "...nobody has the right to ‘govern’ anybody...." << no body - any body.
Obama's remark addressing the Flat Earth Scociety is (probably unknowingly) correct, it being the disingenuous counter reaction to the non-organised flat earthers, those who've come to appreciate both Dubay's work and what is sometimes known as biblical earth. it's the idea that counts, basically asking if we can rather depend on our senses, or on the installed belief that the earth hurtles through space @ 1.000 mph. Big Bang....? hmmm...
cheers, thanks for all the work you do, much appreciated :-))
Yes, it also took me two readings of the book and a lot of looking at the simulator to understand it. If you have not checked it yet, this is the link to the simulator; https://ts.tychos.space/
From what I understand and have seen, a lot of Shack's research regarding 9/11 seems to be incorrect and/or misleading. And to me, the criticisms seem to be pretty tight. Also, when confronted about the glaring errors/issues in his work, the Shack character doesn't address them and appears to resort to evading (see links below).
Of course, this has nothing to do with the Solar System model, but if it is true that this guy has been putting out incorrect information about 9/11, and hasn't been correcting his errors, it is hard for me to trust him with anything else.
Mark Conlon's great research on Shack's work (I believe Conlon used to agree with Shack's work until he started noticing the errors and mistakes in his work):
Why, instead of sending me all these links, don't you just state here what is wrong with his views on 911? I don't have the time to read all the information on these links.
Briefly: Shack is selling that 9/11 planes were cgi, but reputable researchers (see links if interested) very credibly argue against Shack’s points regarding planes being cgi and footage of 9/11 being fake
When confronted with these “errors”, Shack evades, demonstrating his unwillingness to actually figure out what happened that day
Therefore, Shack is likely a controlled op that guides you down the “planes were CGI” route. The purpose of this is likely to be to cover up the technology used that day, in order to keep it covert.
This caught My attention:
"God forbid the majority might realize that we are not only being lied to about optimal nutrition; what if they realize we are also being lied to about vaccines, our monetary system, organised religion, terror attacks and so on.. What if they realize that nobody has the right to ‘govern’ anybody?"
OMG, I'm already there on every point!
Yes, the moneyed psychopaths in control are aiming to take most of Us out, and keep the few left as servants, slaves, sex toys, and sacrifices.
I want to see Them gone and a...
Stigmergic Emergence of Civilization (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/stigmergic-emergence-of-civilization
Yes.. What a wonderful world it could be, I would love to live in a society based on natural law.
🤗 💜 🤗
🎯
RFK, Jr going after the foodstuffs now: pure theatre. it's not to make us healthy, Bobby being too much beholden to & part of the establishment. he's neither addressing better food patterns nor Big pHarma. good one: "...nobody has the right to ‘govern’ anybody...." << no body - any body.
Obama's remark addressing the Flat Earth Scociety is (probably unknowingly) correct, it being the disingenuous counter reaction to the non-organised flat earthers, those who've come to appreciate both Dubay's work and what is sometimes known as biblical earth. it's the idea that counts, basically asking if we can rather depend on our senses, or on the installed belief that the earth hurtles through space @ 1.000 mph. Big Bang....? hmmm...
cheers, thanks for all the work you do, much appreciated :-))
I see Obama as an upper level actor in this play we call reality, Dubay as a lower level actor.
I agree that the earth is probably not hurtling through space @ 1.000 mph, look into the work of Tycho Brahe, expanded upon by Simon Shack.
https://book.tychos.space/
Edit; Ah, and thanks for kind comment. I totally forgot to thank you for it!
thanks. I've looked at the Tychos before. the explanantions make a lot of sense, but it takes time to digest it.
Yes, it also took me two readings of the book and a lot of looking at the simulator to understand it. If you have not checked it yet, this is the link to the simulator; https://ts.tychos.space/
Wasn’t Shack the guy who made the controlled op September Clues film?
How is it a controlled op? I have watched the video, can't find a lot wrong with it.
Hey.
From what I understand and have seen, a lot of Shack's research regarding 9/11 seems to be incorrect and/or misleading. And to me, the criticisms seem to be pretty tight. Also, when confronted about the glaring errors/issues in his work, the Shack character doesn't address them and appears to resort to evading (see links below).
Of course, this has nothing to do with the Solar System model, but if it is true that this guy has been putting out incorrect information about 9/11, and hasn't been correcting his errors, it is hard for me to trust him with anything else.
Andrew Johnson's experience with him:
https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/2012/05/21/9-or-11-clues-about-simon-shack-and-a-3d-analysis-of-flight-175/
Mark Conlon's great research on Shack's work (I believe Conlon used to agree with Shack's work until he started noticing the errors and mistakes in his work):
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-addendum-deceptions?utm_source=publication-search
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-addendum-deceptions-bcd?utm_source=publication-search
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception?utm_source=publication-search
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception-086?utm_source=publication-search
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception-3ff?utm_source=publication-search
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shacks-king-kong-man-in-north?utm_source=publication-search
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shacks-amateur-effort-of-video?utm_source=publication-search
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shack-misrepresents-plane-flight?utm_source=publication-search
Why, instead of sending me all these links, don't you just state here what is wrong with his views on 911? I don't have the time to read all the information on these links.
Briefly: Shack is selling that 9/11 planes were cgi, but reputable researchers (see links if interested) very credibly argue against Shack’s points regarding planes being cgi and footage of 9/11 being fake
When confronted with these “errors”, Shack evades, demonstrating his unwillingness to actually figure out what happened that day
Therefore, Shack is likely a controlled op that guides you down the “planes were CGI” route. The purpose of this is likely to be to cover up the technology used that day, in order to keep it covert.
More links:
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/september-clues-layers-of-deception-3ff?utm_source=publication-search
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shacks-king-kong-man-in-north?utm_source=publication-search
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shacks-amateur-effort-of-video?utm_source=publication-search
https://911planesresearch.substack.com/p/simon-shack-misrepresents-plane-flight?utm_source=publication-search