Yeah.. It is pretty sad. The reason I wrote this post is because I tried to explain this yesterday to my double vaxxed, twice covied volunteer. As with many people, she almost immediately jumped to the 'why' question instead of trying to figure out if what I was saying was indeed correct. So I told her, this is not how it works. First you find out if it is true, then you try to find out how they did it and then you ask yourself why. But when you ignore the first and the second, the third is of no use.
Great minds think alike :) I know it drives me insane. I have a friend who always asks why too and I always say, you worry about the why after you work out if it's true. Also, a motive isn't evidence nor does a seeming lack of one mean a lack of evidence. Grrrrr. But you can't increase people's IQ unfortunately especially when they don't even seem to want to raise it.
Oh and the other really annoying question is when you put forward what someone has said, "Who's that person?" It's not WHO they are it's WHAT they say that counts. Sometimes who might be important but it's just the obvious lack of consideration of content that's irritating.
My advantage was that I was working on a marine base as a civilian and some of the guys were explosives experts. On that day, They were standing there discussing how explosives got into the buildings. They were incredulous when They said it was just jet fuel.
I think it was a combo of explosives initially and then DEW’s to finish it off.
Thanks for elaborating and you are right. If what we saw was real (the gap in the building), it means they made it with explosive/thermite. Newton's third law explains in a very clear way that what we saw, was planned a long time before the event.
Yep. The 911 planners wouldn't risk using any projectiles that involve any unforeseen consequences, such as missing the target and being discovered later or hitting the wrong target. And Building 7 all fell down without anybody asking: "where's the plane?", which shows they were right.
So much knee-slapping! My goodness would they have slapped their knees over the nonsense that is the 9/11 official story.
It truly is hilarious how people can argue for the propaganda in the face of evidence that should be choking them.
Yeah.. It is pretty sad. The reason I wrote this post is because I tried to explain this yesterday to my double vaxxed, twice covied volunteer. As with many people, she almost immediately jumped to the 'why' question instead of trying to figure out if what I was saying was indeed correct. So I told her, this is not how it works. First you find out if it is true, then you try to find out how they did it and then you ask yourself why. But when you ignore the first and the second, the third is of no use.
Great minds think alike :) I know it drives me insane. I have a friend who always asks why too and I always say, you worry about the why after you work out if it's true. Also, a motive isn't evidence nor does a seeming lack of one mean a lack of evidence. Grrrrr. But you can't increase people's IQ unfortunately especially when they don't even seem to want to raise it.
Oh and the other really annoying question is when you put forward what someone has said, "Who's that person?" It's not WHO they are it's WHAT they say that counts. Sometimes who might be important but it's just the obvious lack of consideration of content that's irritating.
Yeah, it was 9/12 that I started saying it was NOT what They were saying it was. Thanks for looking at it again!!!
Thank You for restacking it! And I have to admit it took me a bit longer than 9/12 to see through the deception.
My advantage was that I was working on a marine base as a civilian and some of the guys were explosives experts. On that day, They were standing there discussing how explosives got into the buildings. They were incredulous when They said it was just jet fuel.
I think it was a combo of explosives initially and then DEW’s to finish it off.
Knew those coyote-roadrunner cartoons would bite us in the ass.
AK47 vs. Steel (Penetration Test, various thicknesses)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrXEjw8Vdh8
A-Tip™ Match: Why aluminum tips?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWWeh4x3oj8
Can you make your point instead of posting links?
Just searching for analogies to the claim that the so-called planes entered the building like a hot knife through butter.
The people need to see with their own eyes that such a thing couldn't happen.
Has anyone ever attempted a physical recapitulation of the event as claimed, using a scale model of such a tower and such a plane?
.
These kooks already have a set-up for a simulation of the event -
Deadly 240mph Bowling Ball Cannon! - Ballistic High-Speed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycjblUbiflA
Thanks for elaborating and you are right. If what we saw was real (the gap in the building), it means they made it with explosive/thermite. Newton's third law explains in a very clear way that what we saw, was planned a long time before the event.
Yep. The 911 planners wouldn't risk using any projectiles that involve any unforeseen consequences, such as missing the target and being discovered later or hitting the wrong target. And Building 7 all fell down without anybody asking: "where's the plane?", which shows they were right.